I’ve ranted previously about shoddy BBC journalism, more recently I’ve seen more examples of what I term Twitter journalism. The worst protagonist for cultivating this drivel is Daily Mail Online, but that’s their raison d’être and absurd sensationalism is what you expect when you visit their site.
It’s sad to see the scourge of Twitter journalism now creeping insidiously into BBC News. There’s no better example than this article on BBC News: HD signal ‘lost’ during Wimbledon
That looks interesting I thought, surely as lead broadcaster the BBC would be the most dependable news organisation to go to for the low-down.
How wrong could I be! Never have I seen such a moronic and baseless article, totally devoid of facts or informative content.
It starts well enough:
Viewers watching Andy Murray and David Ferrer’s Wimbledon quarter final clash missed vital seconds of the match as BBC One HD went off the air.
So what was the cause?
“It was down on Sky [and] Freeview,” said one viewer on Twitter. “Sky had a very basic fault message on a black background. Freeview was just black.”
You’ve just told us that. We don’t need it reiterating by a random faceless quote.
But the match was still available on the BBC’s standard definition channel. Dozens of people complained about the loss of picture on social media sites.
Yes yes, I understand that people were rightly upset about the break in transmission. So what actually happened?
“Who’s stolen BBC HD?” asked Neil Sculley on Twitter.
“When will the HD return?” added Richard M. “It’s been about 20 mins and no announcement.”
No factual news content here, just a few questions scraped up from Twitter. I’m still none the wiser.
Some viewers reported that when the picture did return, it was a standard definition picture, not HD.
But, by 18:00, normal service appeared to have been restored.
“Appeared”? In case you hadn’t noticed, you work for the BBC. Wasn’t there someone in the internal directory you could ask?
“Panic over, HD resumed on BBC,” said Jamie Grace.
“Murray is now even uglier and angrier than normal.”
So the official confirmation of service being resumed was another comment on Twitter?
It’s no wonder the author of this ‘article’ hasn’t dared put their name to it.
Shame on you BBC.