PayPal exposed

I recently won an eBay auction and promptly paid using the preferred PayPal method, which according to eBay is “The fast, easy & safe way to pay“.

Conveniently (for them) eBay also own PayPal and so not only do they earn revenue from the auction listing fees and 5.25% of the final value, but also 3.4% of the payment transaction amount.

I was shocked to later receive an email from eBay informing me that the seller’s trading privileges had been suspended and the listing removed, but they would not share any further information due to “privacy concerns”. So I was left with £216 deducted from my credit card and no item to show for it.

Not to worry I thought, PayPal boast that their “Buyer Protection helps you to buy with confidence; purchases may be covered up to £500, at no additional cost.

The key word there is “may”. Only particular auctions that meet strict eligibility requirements are protected to this value. For standard transactions the most you can hope to claim back via PayPal’s dispute resolution process is £120 minus £15 for what they call an “eBay processing cost” – a paltry £105 in total, no matter how much you paid using their supposedly safe payment method.

Faced with the prospect of being £111 out of pocket, I contacted my credit card company to seek recompense for the full amount via what is called a ‘Chargeback’. I was surprised to discover that a Chargeback can be instigated many weeks or even months after a transaction takes place, so an unscrupulous buyer can attempt to reverse a transaction long after you assume it has completed. It seems to me that PayPal is riddled with loopholes and far from the perceived safe trading environment.

Fortunately my seller eventually came good and refunded the purchase in full, but I was lucky and I doubt that I will consider PayPal for high value purchases in future. BBC’s Watchdog programme has also covered this issue, there is more information and advise on their web site.

Finally, make sure that you pay close attention to the full description of what you are bidding on. One unfortunate buyer has just paid £470 for a photo of a Xbox 360! He failed to read the small print: “This auction is not for a Xbox 360 game system, but instead of picture of one.”

» eBayer pays £470 for photo of Xbox 360

Call queue challenge

Your time is precious” proclaims the SpinVox web site.

For those not in the know, SpinVox is a service that “converts your voicemails into text messages and sends them straight to your mobile phone or email.”

This is not a rant directed at the SpinVox translation service as I have been using SpinVox for a few months and it has generally been ok. The quality of speech to text translation can be a bit ropey and it is evident that they are using humans to convert at least some of the messages, so if privacy is a concern then don’t use this service.

My issue is with their “time is precious” motto. If my time is so precious to them, why did they keep me waiting in a call queue for 61 minutes to cancel my subscription?

May I ask why you are cancelling your subscription with us?” the advisor asked.
“Do you know how long I have been waiting in the call queue?” I asked in return.
Er, sorry about that… about half an hour?
“No, sixty-one minutes to be precise”
Oh, that’s bad

Too right it’s bad. Can anyone beat 61 minutes on hold?

For reference, you can also cancel SpinVox by sending “STOP” to 84004 (which isn’t mentioned on their web site).

Movie rentals

As you may recollect from a previous entry, I have ditched Sky Movies in favour of a postal DVD rental service. All these services are based on the same concept, you enter a long list of films that you would like to watch and provide either a preference or ranking of the priority order in which you would like to receive them.

I first tried Tesco DVD, which is a service provided by Video Island. These are the people behind other DVD rental brands such as Screen Select, MSN DVD, easyCinema and ITV Movieclub. If you join any of these, it’s all coming from the same place, so expect a similar service level from each.

My initial impression of the Tesco service was that they offered good value for money, most of my returns were processed within a day and the turnaround was quick and efficient. But after a few weeks I noticed that I rarely if ever received titles that I had prioritised at the top of my wish list. I monitored this situation and eventually cancelled my subscription as the obviously popular titles were never being sent to me.

Next I tried LOVEFiLM for a three week free trial, they claim to be “Europe’s No.1 DVD rental service“. I diligently inputted my wish list (a ‘Rental Queue’ in their terminology) and awaited the deliveries. The first few titles I received were from the bottom third of my queue, so again a disappointing start. To make matters worse, when I enquired why it had taken so long to allocate my next title, I received this response:

“We have been unable to send you your full allocation of discs, due to the limited selection of titles in your queue. You have 17 available titles in your queue.”

So of all the titles in my queue (actually they lied – it was 19), they could not find a single one to send me. That’s tantamount to an admission that you are unlikely to receive anything from your top 20.

They went on to say: “We also recommend that you have at least 20 to 50 titles in your queue at all times, in order to receive a regular service.”

How many people can list 50 films that they would like to watch – and be satisfied with only receiving older or obscure titles from the tail end of the list?

This is the fundamental flaw in the DVD rental model and where Sky Movies have the advantage. The majority of customers are fighting for the same limited supply of new releases and blockbusters. This is evident when you walk to your local rental store, we all know you have to get there early for the best films. Sky don’t have this problem as they broadcast to everyone at the same time.

I have cancelled my membership and for the moment I am going back to my local rental store. At least there I have an influence over the choice instead of relying on a computer lottery.

The final word from LOVEFiLM was: “Did you know? In the last Week you have paid an average of £3.03 per disc.” Hmm, great. So I would have payed nearly the same as at my local store, but for films that I didn’t really want to watch. What a fantastic service! 🙄

Credit Reports

Section 7 of the Data Protection Act 1998 provides individuals with the right to apply for a copy of the information held by credit reference agencies which relates to them.

I recently checked the information that credit reference agencies have on me and was surprised to find that most of them had created and maintained a financial connection between myself and my ex. It seems that unless you personally take steps to correct this, it could stay on your credit report ad-infinitum and affect your credit scoring.

It costs just £2 to request your personal credit report from each agency, so it’s well worth checking. Don’t be fooled into subscribing to their monitoring services, there isn’t any need as the statutory report will tell you everything you need to know.

The application forms can be difficult to find so I have included direct links below (please let me know if any of the links are broken).

The report should arrive within a week. You can remove a stale financial association or other erroneous data by contacting the agencies direct or submitting the relevant online form.

Why the long face?

I spotted this article in my local paper. I don’t wish to make light of an obviously harrowing experience for the victim, but what a vivid physical description! Could this thief be the King of Chavs? I’d love to see an artists impression!

A BIG-EARED robber with missing teeth kicked and shoved a man before stealing his £300 mobile phone.

The victim had sat down on a grass verge near the junction of Keel Drive and Chalvey High Street to read a text at around 1.45pm on Thursday last week.

He noticed a man standing in front of him who asked for the time, but then pulled him to his feet before pushing him back into a concrete bridge support.

The robber then managed to grab the phone and shoved the victim to the ground and kicked him before running off towards Chalvey Grove.

The robber is described as white, aged 20 to 25, around 5ft 10in with a long face.

He had big ears and a couple of front teeth missing from the top row. He was wearing a blue and white striped polo shirt, blue jeans, white trainers and a dark blue baseball cap, with a chunky gold ring on his right hand.

A second man, who may have been acting as an accomplice keeping lookout, wore blue jeans and white trainers.

If you have information phone the police on 08458 505505 or Crimestoppers anonymously on 0800 555111.

I believe I may have identified the thief…